Showing posts with label CDRH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CDRH. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

FDA/CDRH Device Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee (DGMPAC) -Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001

The FDA's looking for a few good medtech members
 

The FDA solicits candidates for medical device industry representatives to join the Center for Devices & Radiological Health's Device Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee.
FDA logo
The FDA is seeking written recommendations for candidates to sit on the Center for Devices & Radiological Health's Device Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee, according to a note in the Federal Register.
The federal watchdog agency asked for written recommendations of medical device industry representatives who will hold a non-voting seat on the DGMPAC, a committee tasked with reviewing proposed regulations and making recommendations on medical device manufacturing practices.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71804-71805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001]


Request for Notification From Industry Organizations Interested
in Participating in the Selection Process for Nonvoting Industry
Representatives and Request for Nominations for Nonvoting Industry
Representatives on the Device Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory
Committee

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting that any
industry organization interested in participating in the selection of
nonvoting industry representatives to serve on the Device Good
Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee (DGMPAC) in the Center for
Devices and Radiological Health notify FDA in writing. A nominee may
either be self-nominated or nominated by an organization to serve as a
nonvoting industry representative. Nominations will be accepted for
current vacancies effective with this notice.

DATES: Any industry organizations interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting members to represent industry
interests must send a letter stating that interest to FDA by January 3,
2013, for the vacancies listed in this notice. Concurrently, nomination
materials for prospective candidates should be sent to FDA by January
3, 2013.

ADDRESSES: All letters of interest and nominations should be submitted
in writing to Margaret J. Ames (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret J. Ames, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5234, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
5960, margaret.ames@fda.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 520 of the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360j), as amended, provides that the DGMPAC
shall be composed of two representatives of interests of the device
manufacturing industry. The Agency is requesting nominations for
nonvoting industry representatives on the DGMPAC.

I. Function of DGMPAC

    Review proposed regulations issuance regarding good manufacturing
practices governing the methods used in, and the facilities and
controls used for manufacture, packaging, storage, installation, and
servicing of devices, and make recommendations regarding the
feasibility and reasonableness of those proposed regulations. The
committee also reviews and makes recommendations on proposed guidelines
developed to assist the medical device industry in meeting the good
manufacturing practice requirements, and provides advice with regard to
any petition submitted by a manufacturer for an exemption or variance
from good manufacturing practice regulations.

II. Qualifications

    Persons nominated for the DGMPAC should possess appropriate
qualifications to understand and contribute to the committee's work as
described in the committee's function.

[[Page 71805]]

III. Selection Procedure

    Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry
interests should send a letter stating that interest to the FDA contact
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) within 30 days of publication of
this document (see DATES). Within the subsequent 30 days, FDA will send
a letter to each organization that has expressed an interest, attaching
a complete list of all such organizations, and a list of all nominees
along with their current resumes. The letter will also state that it is
the responsibility of the interested organizations to confer with one
another and to select a candidate, within 60 days after the receipt of
the FDA letter, to serve as the nonvoting member to represent industry
interests for a particular committee. The interested organizations are
not bound by the list of nominees in selecting a candidate. However, if
no individual is selected within the 60 days, the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs will select the nonvoting member to represent industry
interests.

IV. Application Procedure

    Individuals may self nominate and/or an organization may nominate
one or more individuals to serve as a nonvoting industry
representative. Contact information, a current curriculum vitae, and
the name of the committee of interest should be sent to the FDA contact
person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) within 30 days of
publication of this document (see DATES). FDA will forward all
nominations to the organizations expressing interest in participating
in the selection process for the committee. (Persons who nominate
themselves as nonvoting industry representatives will not participate
in the selection process).
    FDA seeks to include the views of women and men, members of all
racial and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities
on its advisory committees, and therefore encourages nominations of
appropriately qualified candidates from these groups. Specifically, in
this document, nominations for nonvoting representatives of industry
interests are encouraged from device manufacturing industry.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14 relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: November 28, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-29165 Filed 12-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P

FDA / CDRH 2013 Strategic Priorities released

Link to: CDRH 2013 Strategic Priorities


The Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH, the Center) 2013 Strategic Priorities continue and expand upon the work we first started three years ago to reset the direction of the Center towards smart regulation – protecting public health by assuring that devices that enter and remain on the U.S. market are safe and effective, and promoting public health by facilitating device innovation. However, the structure of this year's Strategic Priorities has been re-organized to align with CDRH's Vision, which, along with our Mission and Shared Values, immediately follow this Introduction. You will note that our Vision begins with the word Patients. We intentionally began our Vision with this word because what is at the heart of what we do and what we truly are about is saving the lives, improving the health and enhancing the quality of life of patients and those who one day will or would have been patients.

Although we have re-aligned our Strategic Priorities to support the achievement of our Vision, you will see that the objectives of our 2010-2012 Strategic Priorities2 (such as fully implementing a total product life cycle approach) are encompassed within our 2013 plan. In addition, we have kept our earlier Strategic Priority of Strengthening Our Workforce and Workplace in the 2013 plan, consistent with the Center's Shared Value of Our People. A vibrant workforce and workplace are essential to achieving our Mission and Vision.

The primary purpose of CDRH's 2013 Strategic Priorities is to inform the public of some of the most important actions we are committing to implement this year to better understand the direction the Center is heading in and what to expect from us this year. It is not intended as a comprehensive blueprint of every action the Center may take in the coming months.

Lastly, in July 2012, Congress enacted the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Improvement Act (FDASIA)3, which includes reauthorization of the medical device user fee program4 and other device-related provisions. We consider implementation of FDASIA to be a top priority for CDRH. Therefore, as a well understood priority, we will implement or begin to implement all of the device-related provisions of FDASIA this year. However, because the FDA has provided a separate mechanism to inform the public of its efforts to implement FDASIA, we have generally not included actions specifically directed at implementing FDASIA in our 2013 Strategic Priorities.

Link to: CDRH 2013 Strategic Priorities

Sunday, April 29, 2012

FDA Introduces Triage Pilot Program: Increasing efficiencies for device review


ALBERTO GUTIERREZ for Quality Digest

During the next few months, manufacturers of certain in vitro diagnostic and radiology products may start to notice they are getting decisions on their premarket notification submissions, aka 510(k), sooner than expected. This will be due to a six-month pilot program called Triage, launched recently by the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety, a part of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).
The goal of Triage is to improve efficiencies in the device review process. Reviewers will focus more of their time and attention on novel and higher-risk devices, like companion diagnostics devices, and less time on devices that are lower risk and have well-known and well-understood safety and effectiveness profiles.
As the name “Triage” suggests, when certain 510(k) submissions are submitted, reviewers will make an assessment of the level of resources needed to complete a review, based on a quick assessment of the submission’s content and completeness. High-quality submissions that meet certain criteria and contain all of the information needed for a substantial equivalence evaluation will be slated for a 30-day Quick Review. Those 510(k) submissions not meeting these criteria would receive the standard review (generally 90 days) consistent with user fee performance goals.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Discussion with Former Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Management, DIA2012

Discussion with Former Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Management

Monday, June 25, 2012
3:30 pm- 5:00PM ET

Join this moderated panel discussion with former CDRH Directors and Management. This interactive session will focus on the evolving face of medical devices, the interface between drugs and devices, new challenges and opportunities, and the changing regulatory landscape.

Chair

Daniel G. Schultz, MDDaniel G. Schultz, MD
Senior Vice President, Medical Devices & Combination Products, Greenleaf Health, LLC

Speakers

David W. Feigal, JR, MD, MPHDavid W. Feigal, JR, MD, MPH
Partner
NDA Partners, LLC
Donna-Bea Tillman, PhD Donna-Bea Tillman, PhD
Senior Consultant
Biologics Consulting Group
Timothy Alan UlatowskiTimothy Alan Ulatowski, MS
Director, Medical Devices
Becker & Associates Consulting, Inc.
United States

Monday, April 9, 2012

CDRH Seeks To Expand Public-Private Medical Device Epidemiology Network

FDA hopes the MDEpiNet post-market surveillance program will be fully functional by the end of the year. A May public meeting is planned to catalyze the effort.

CDRH Seeks To Expand Public-Private Medical Device Epidemiology Network Article preview from "The Gray Sheet"- April 9, 2012
FDA plans to reach out to the public at a meeting this May to expand its nascent public-private Medical Device Epidemiology Network and discuss models for the network to improve device surveillance.
The network, also known as MDEpiNet, has an “overall mission to bridge the gaps that we currently have in the evidence for medical devices,” said Danica Marinac-Dabic, director of CDRH’s Division of Epidemiology in the Office of Biometrics and Surveillance, in an interview.

http://www.medicaldevicestoday.com/2012/04/cdrh-seeks-to-expand-public-private-medical-device-epidemiology-network.html